User talk:Admin - Revision history

imported>KanamoriKamper at 00:05, 4 January 2025

2025-01-04T00:05:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 3 January 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: Hello, we have been hesitant about assigning any roles beyond the automated "auto confirmed" role in the past. Given our relatively hands-off approach over the past couple of months, we are now more open to this idea. We believe the largely flat structure of the wiki has contributed to its success and relatively high quality, and we wish to avoid the potential for misuse of elevated privileges. I propose holding a vote on this talk pages. We will not be adding any additional roles beyond those listed here [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:User_rights_and_groups] and no one will gain access to any infrastructure, including plugins. Also getting these roles does not grant you any more say than any other user, just allows people to clean up what a normal user can only revert / edit away. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])		: Hello, we have been hesitant about assigning any roles beyond the automated "auto confirmed" role in the past. Given our relatively hands-off approach over the past couple of months, we are now more open to this idea. We believe the largely flat structure of the wiki has contributed to its success and relatively high quality, and we wish to avoid the potential for misuse of elevated privileges. I propose holding a vote on this talk pages. We will not be adding any additional roles beyond those listed here [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:User_rights_and_groups] and no one will gain access to any infrastructure, including plugins. Also getting these roles does not grant you any more say than any other user, just allows people to clean up what a normal user can only revert / edit away. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])

	I'm fine with having the roles you linked being added to the wiki! I will hold a vote in the Discord server, and I will tell you the results of it. [[User:KanamoriKamper\|KanamoriKamper]] ([[User talk:KanamoriKamper\|talk]])		: I'm fine with having the roles you linked being added to the wiki! I will hold a vote in the Discord server, and I will tell you the results of it. [[User:KanamoriKamper\|KanamoriKamper]] ([[User talk:KanamoriKamper\|talk]])

imported>KanamoriKamper at 00:05, 4 January 2025

2025-01-04T00:05:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 3 January 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: Hello, we have been hesitant about assigning any roles beyond the automated "auto confirmed" role in the past. Given our relatively hands-off approach over the past couple of months, we are now more open to this idea. We believe the largely flat structure of the wiki has contributed to its success and relatively high quality, and we wish to avoid the potential for misuse of elevated privileges. I propose holding a vote on this talk pages. We will not be adding any additional roles beyond those listed here [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:User_rights_and_groups] and no one will gain access to any infrastructure, including plugins. Also getting these roles does not grant you any more say than any other user, just allows people to clean up what a normal user can only revert / edit away. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])		: Hello, we have been hesitant about assigning any roles beyond the automated "auto confirmed" role in the past. Given our relatively hands-off approach over the past couple of months, we are now more open to this idea. We believe the largely flat structure of the wiki has contributed to its success and relatively high quality, and we wish to avoid the potential for misuse of elevated privileges. I propose holding a vote on this talk pages. We will not be adding any additional roles beyond those listed here [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:User_rights_and_groups] and no one will gain access to any infrastructure, including plugins. Also getting these roles does not grant you any more say than any other user, just allows people to clean up what a normal user can only revert / edit away. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])

			I'm fine with having the roles you linked being added to the wiki! I will hold a vote in the Discord server, and I will tell you the results of it. [[User:KanamoriKamper\|KanamoriKamper]] ([[User talk:KanamoriKamper\|talk]])

imported>Admin: Archiving old request. Will remain in history

2025-01-02T04:54:34Z

Archiving old request. Will remain in history

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 2 January 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Hello,~~

	I’m requesting that you would please delete the page about me from this wiki. Numerous claims that are written on there are absolutely untrue. I do not run the TikTok account @daniellarsonprison2024 therefore when you are writing that ‘ The account has a fake cashtag in bio where he scams people for money ‘ you are falsely accusing me of fraud.

	As my full name is still logged in the page history this page appears when my name is searched into google which means any potential employers/universities are going to see your false claims. This is absolutely libel/defamation and if I am able to get your details from the domain registrar you are going to have a big problem.

	: Hello, thank you for bringing this to my attention, I am admittedly not as active as I once was and will investigate. In the mean time I will hide the entire page history to remedy results showing up on Google. As your account is unbanned I encourage you to remove any information you deem libel, any information posted to this wiki is on the onus of the editor who created the edit and it's on the editor to prove something as true. Not for people to prove something isn't. I respect people's privacy and will take this very seriously. Please allow a little bit of time to process [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])

	: PS I believe we can hide pages from search results, which I think should be done to all pages about people who have interacted with Daniel. Speaking with our web admin now. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])


	To preface, you threatening to have the wiki taken down (or whatever you intend) if you find out what details are in our domain is not the way to ask. Secondly, nothing in your article was false, and there is proof to back. I don’t know you as a person, but threatening to kill yourself when you get confronted for helping a pedophile sure is something. Also, from day one of your account creation you tried to vandalize your page several times. What is reasonable, however, is the removal of your name. I can’t do that but if the admin wants to do that, I would find it reasonable. If you can provide proof that you are not the owner of the fake account of Daniel, please provide proof -KanamoriKamper


	How am I meant to provide proof that I don’t own the account? Surely the onus would be on you to provide proof that I do own the account? I haven’t even looked at anything to do with Daniel for the last 2 months I only noticed you’d made this page when I went on Reddit the other day and your post about me came up on my homepage. If you look at my account on TikTok I didn’t post a single video between may and the end of July if I was desperate for views or attention why would I not be posting on an account that has almost 100,000 followers

	== More moderators ==		== More moderators ==

imported>Admin at 04:52, 2 January 2025

2025-01-02T04:52:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, 2 January 2025
Line 18:		Line 18:

	As [[User:KanamoriKamper\|KanamoriKamper]] has stated in the Discord, the wiki has been getting an influx of vandals which have defaced multiple pages. While their edits are usually reversed without much fuss, it's still quite annoying. If more admins/moderators could be added to the team to make vandalism less of a habit to deal with, that would be greatly appreciated.		As [[User:KanamoriKamper\|KanamoriKamper]] has stated in the Discord, the wiki has been getting an influx of vandals which have defaced multiple pages. While their edits are usually reversed without much fuss, it's still quite annoying. If more admins/moderators could be added to the team to make vandalism less of a habit to deal with, that would be greatly appreciated.

			: Hello, we have been hesitant about assigning any roles beyond the automated "auto confirmed" role in the past. Given our relatively hands-off approach over the past couple of months, we are now more open to this idea. We believe the largely flat structure of the wiki has contributed to its success and relatively high quality, and we wish to avoid the potential for misuse of elevated privileges. I propose holding a vote on this talk pages. We will not be adding any additional roles beyond those listed here [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:User_rights_and_groups] and no one will gain access to any infrastructure, including plugins. Also getting these roles does not grant you any more say than any other user, just allows people to clean up what a normal user can only revert / edit away. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])

imported>Stigiyon: /* More moderators */ new section

2025-01-02T01:28:49Z

More moderators: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 1 January 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	How am I meant to provide proof that I don’t own the account? Surely the onus would be on you to provide proof that I do own the account? I haven’t even looked at anything to do with Daniel for the last 2 months I only noticed you’d made this page when I went on Reddit the other day and your post about me came up on my homepage. If you look at my account on TikTok I didn’t post a single video between may and the end of July if I was desperate for views or attention why would I not be posting on an account that has almost 100,000 followers		How am I meant to provide proof that I don’t own the account? Surely the onus would be on you to provide proof that I do own the account? I haven’t even looked at anything to do with Daniel for the last 2 months I only noticed you’d made this page when I went on Reddit the other day and your post about me came up on my homepage. If you look at my account on TikTok I didn’t post a single video between may and the end of July if I was desperate for views or attention why would I not be posting on an account that has almost 100,000 followers

			== More moderators ==

			As [[User:KanamoriKamper\|KanamoriKamper]] has stated in the Discord, the wiki has been getting an influx of vandals which have defaced multiple pages. While their edits are usually reversed without much fuss, it's still quite annoying. If more admins/moderators could be added to the team to make vandalism less of a habit to deal with, that would be greatly appreciated.

imported>Lucas at 13:42, 2 August 2024

2024-08-02T13:42:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:42, 2 August 2024
Line 11:		Line 11:

	To preface, you threatening to have the wiki taken down (or whatever you intend) if you find out what details are in our domain is not the way to ask. Secondly, nothing in your article was false, and there is proof to back. I don’t know you as a person, but threatening to kill yourself when you get confronted for helping a pedophile sure is something. Also, from day one of your account creation you tried to vandalize your page several times. What is reasonable, however, is the removal of your name. I can’t do that but if the admin wants to do that, I would find it reasonable. If you can provide proof that you are not the owner of the fake account of Daniel, please provide proof -KanamoriKamper		To preface, you threatening to have the wiki taken down (or whatever you intend) if you find out what details are in our domain is not the way to ask. Secondly, nothing in your article was false, and there is proof to back. I don’t know you as a person, but threatening to kill yourself when you get confronted for helping a pedophile sure is something. Also, from day one of your account creation you tried to vandalize your page several times. What is reasonable, however, is the removal of your name. I can’t do that but if the admin wants to do that, I would find it reasonable. If you can provide proof that you are not the owner of the fake account of Daniel, please provide proof -KanamoriKamper


			How am I meant to provide proof that I don’t own the account? Surely the onus would be on you to provide proof that I do own the account? I haven’t even looked at anything to do with Daniel for the last 2 months I only noticed you’d made this page when I went on Reddit the other day and your post about me came up on my homepage. If you look at my account on TikTok I didn’t post a single video between may and the end of July if I was desperate for views or attention why would I not be posting on an account that has almost 100,000 followers

imported>Admin at 13:23, 2 August 2024

2024-08-02T13:23:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:23, 2 August 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: Hello, thank you for bringing this to my attention, I am admittedly not as active as I once was and will investigate. In the mean time I will hide the entire page history to remedy results showing up on Google. As your account is unbanned I encourage you to remove any information you deem libel, any information posted to this wiki is on the onus of the editor who created the edit and it's on the editor to prove something as true. Not for people to prove something isn't. I respect people's privacy and will take this very seriously. Please allow a little bit of time to process [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])		: Hello, thank you for bringing this to my attention, I am admittedly not as active as I once was and will investigate. In the mean time I will hide the entire page history to remedy results showing up on Google. As your account is unbanned I encourage you to remove any information you deem libel, any information posted to this wiki is on the onus of the editor who created the edit and it's on the editor to prove something as true. Not for people to prove something isn't. I respect people's privacy and will take this very seriously. Please allow a little bit of time to process [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])

			: PS I believe we can hide pages from search results, which I think should be done to all pages about people who have interacted with Daniel. Speaking with our web admin now. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])


	To preface, you threatening to have the wiki taken down (or whatever you intend) if you find out what details are in our domain is not the way to ask. Secondly, nothing in your article was false, and there is proof to back. I don’t know you as a person, but threatening to kill yourself when you get confronted for helping a pedophile sure is something. Also, from day one of your account creation you tried to vandalize your page several times. What is reasonable, however, is the removal of your name. I can’t do that but if the admin wants to do that, I would find it reasonable. If you can provide proof that you are not the owner of the fake account of Daniel, please provide proof -KanamoriKamper		To preface, you threatening to have the wiki taken down (or whatever you intend) if you find out what details are in our domain is not the way to ask. Secondly, nothing in your article was false, and there is proof to back. I don’t know you as a person, but threatening to kill yourself when you get confronted for helping a pedophile sure is something. Also, from day one of your account creation you tried to vandalize your page several times. What is reasonable, however, is the removal of your name. I can’t do that but if the admin wants to do that, I would find it reasonable. If you can provide proof that you are not the owner of the fake account of Daniel, please provide proof -KanamoriKamper

imported>Admin: Response to lucas

2024-08-02T13:17:28Z

Response to lucas

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 2 August 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	As my full name is still logged in the page history this page appears when my name is searched into google which means any potential employers/universities are going to see your false claims. This is absolutely libel/defamation and if I am able to get your details from the domain registrar you are going to have a big problem.		As my full name is still logged in the page history this page appears when my name is searched into google which means any potential employers/universities are going to see your false claims. This is absolutely libel/defamation and if I am able to get your details from the domain registrar you are going to have a big problem.

			: Hello, thank you for bringing this to my attention, I am admittedly not as active as I once was and will investigate. In the mean time I will hide the entire page history to remedy results showing up on Google. As your account is unbanned I encourage you to remove any information you deem libel, any information posted to this wiki is on the onus of the editor who created the edit and it's on the editor to prove something as true. Not for people to prove something isn't. I respect people's privacy and will take this very seriously. Please allow a little bit of time to process [[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]])


	To preface, you threatening to have the wiki taken down (or whatever you intend) if you find out what details are in our domain is not the way to ask. Secondly, nothing in your article was false, and there is proof to back. I don’t know you as a person, but threatening to kill yourself when you get confronted for helping a pedophile sure is something. Also, from day one of your account creation you tried to vandalize your page several times. What is reasonable, however, is the removal of your name. I can’t do that but if the admin wants to do that, I would find it reasonable. If you can provide proof that you are not the owner of the fake account of Daniel, please provide proof -KanamoriKamper		To preface, you threatening to have the wiki taken down (or whatever you intend) if you find out what details are in our domain is not the way to ask. Secondly, nothing in your article was false, and there is proof to back. I don’t know you as a person, but threatening to kill yourself when you get confronted for helping a pedophile sure is something. Also, from day one of your account creation you tried to vandalize your page several times. What is reasonable, however, is the removal of your name. I can’t do that but if the admin wants to do that, I would find it reasonable. If you can provide proof that you are not the owner of the fake account of Daniel, please provide proof -KanamoriKamper

imported>KanamoriKamper at 12:36, 2 August 2024

2024-08-02T12:36:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:36, 2 August 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	As my full name is still logged in the page history this page appears when my name is searched into google which means any potential employers/universities are going to see your false claims. This is absolutely libel/defamation and if I am able to get your details from the domain registrar you are going to have a big problem.		As my full name is still logged in the page history this page appears when my name is searched into google which means any potential employers/universities are going to see your false claims. This is absolutely libel/defamation and if I am able to get your details from the domain registrar you are going to have a big problem.


			To preface, you threatening to have the wiki taken down (or whatever you intend) if you find out what details are in our domain is not the way to ask. Secondly, nothing in your article was false, and there is proof to back. I don’t know you as a person, but threatening to kill yourself when you get confronted for helping a pedophile sure is something. Also, from day one of your account creation you tried to vandalize your page several times. What is reasonable, however, is the removal of your name. I can’t do that but if the admin wants to do that, I would find it reasonable. If you can provide proof that you are not the owner of the fake account of Daniel, please provide proof -KanamoriKamper

imported>Lucas: Created page with "Hello, I’m requesting that you would please delete the page about me from this wiki. Numerous claims that are written on there are absolutely untrue. I do not run the TikTok account @daniellarsonprison2024 therefore when you are writing that ‘ The account has a fake cashtag in bio where he scams people for money ‘ you are falsely accusing me of fraud. As my full name is still logged in the page history this page appears when my name is searched into google which..."

2024-08-02T08:14:57Z

Created page with "Hello, I’m requesting that you would please delete the page about me from this wiki. Numerous claims that are written on there are absolutely untrue. I do not run the TikTok account @daniellarsonprison2024 therefore when you are writing that ‘ The account has a fake cashtag in bio where he scams people for money ‘ you are falsely accusing me of fraud. As my full name is still logged in the page history this page appears when my name is searched into google which..."

New page

Hello,

I’m requesting that you would please delete the page about me from this wiki. Numerous claims that are written on there are absolutely untrue. I do not run the TikTok account @daniellarsonprison2024 therefore when you are writing that ‘ The account has a fake cashtag in bio where he scams people for money ‘ you are falsely accusing me of fraud.

As my full name is still logged in the page history this page appears when my name is searched into google which means any potential employers/universities are going to see your false claims. This is absolutely libel/defamation and if I am able to get your details from the domain registrar you are going to have a big problem.