Andrew: Difference between revisions

There is reason to believe that Andrew is not actually responsible for Daniel's accusations. Daniel has claimed that he spoken over the phone with Andrew, who said that Daniel did not "need to go to court, regardless of what the warrants" said. This was clear evidence that Daniel purposely used Andrew as a scapegoat for any problem that occurred in his life. There is no possibility that Andrew, a state employee, had told Daniel not to appear in court. Instead, Daniel saw an opportunity to avoid going to court (as well as any further “failure to appear” fines) by a utilizing a baseless claim that his disability case manager said he was not required to attend.