Anonymous user
Papa Gut: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Huge bias present in the article, laid out both sides.
imported>YungCyraxx No edit summary |
imported>YungCyraxx (Huge bias present in the article, laid out both sides.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Controversy == | == Controversy == | ||
Papa Gut is controversial to the Daniel Larson community. | Papa Gut is controversial to the Daniel Larson community. | ||
The Daniel Larson community claims he is uneducated and biased when talking about Daniel, and that Papa Gut was enabling Daniel's actions via Papa Gut excusing his awful actions with mental illness and seemingly always taking Daniel's side. | |||
Papa Gut claims that the Daniel Larson community is uneducated about mental illness and that they engage in the stalking and harassment of a man who does not have culpability in his actions. | |||
== Reliability == | |||
Papa Gut is seen as an unreliable source of information in the community for the reasons stated beforehand. Ultimately, while Papa Gut is not as good of a source of information when compared with other YouTubers, his videos should be taken with a grain of salt for a few reasons. | |||
* Bias | |||
** Papa Gut, justifiably or not, has a bias towards Daniel and that should be accounted for. | |||
* Potential lack of context and outdated content | |||
** Papa Gut does not make documentaries, and instead makes updates for Daniel. This is a double-edged sword, as while he often strikes the iron while it's hot, his videos can be inaccurate and can be outdated if new information went out. | |||
* Monetary reasons | |||
** Papa Gut has a monetary incentive behind his participation in the saga which can definitely affect his, as well as every other Daniel Larson YouTuber's, credibility. | |||
Ultimately, while you can use Papa Gut as a source of information, don't blindly believe him at face value and try to find better sources. | |||