Anonymous user
Andrew: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
imported>Admin m (Reverted edits by Joshuaisthekingofnyc (talk) to last revision by Dank3a) |
imported>YungCyraxxAlt mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<center> | <center>{{Doxxing}}{{Sources}}</center> | ||
== Andrew == | == Andrew == | ||
Andrew is one of Daniel’s former [[Daniel Larson's case managers|case managers]], known most notoriously for being the scapegoat of Daniel's issues during his [[Homeless Arc]]. After leaving care under [[Jonas]], due to Daniel's developmental disabilities and homelessness, Daniel was assigned a case manager by the state government of Colorado. | Andrew is one of Daniel’s former [[Daniel Larson's case managers|case managers]], known most notoriously for being the scapegoat of Daniel's issues during his [[Homeless Arc]]. After leaving care under [[Jonas]], due to Daniel's developmental disabilities and homelessness, Daniel was assigned a case manager by the state government of Colorado. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
There is reason to believe that Andrew is not actually responsible for Daniel's accusations. Daniel has claimed that he spoken over the phone with Andrew, who said that Daniel did not "need to go to court, regardless of what the warrants" said. This was clear evidence that Daniel purposely used Andrew as a scapegoat for any problem that occurred in his life. There is no possibility that Andrew, a state employee, had told Daniel not to appear in court. Instead, Daniel saw an opportunity to avoid going to court (as well as any further “failure to appear” fines) by a utilizing a baseless claim that his disability case manager said he was not required to attend. | There is reason to believe that Andrew is not actually responsible for Daniel's accusations. Daniel has claimed that he spoken over the phone with Andrew, who said that Daniel did not "need to go to court, regardless of what the warrants" said. This was clear evidence that Daniel purposely used Andrew as a scapegoat for any problem that occurred in his life. There is no possibility that Andrew, a state employee, had told Daniel not to appear in court. Instead, Daniel saw an opportunity to avoid going to court (as well as any further “failure to appear” fines) by a utilizing a baseless claim that his disability case manager said he was not required to attend. | ||
== Sources == | |||