Anonymous user
Andrew: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Andrew: updated to make andrew former instead of currently current) |
imported>HoodMoney54 No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Doxxing}} | |||
{{Sources}} | |||
== | '''Andrew''' was one of Daniel's [[Daniel Larson's case managers|case managers]], known most notoriously for being the scapegoat of Daniel's issues during his [[Homeless Arc]]. After leaving care under [[Jonas]], due to Daniel's developmental disabilities and homelessness, Daniel was assigned a case manager by the state government of Colorado. | ||
== Daniel's relationship with Andrew == | |||
Daniel's developmental disabilities and online manipulation cause him to think that he is extremely famous. Due to the nature of Daniel's care, Andrew was often blamed by Daniel for stealing money, destroying his career, as well as making his life difficult. In many of Daniel's TikToks, Daniel shows disregard and contempt for Andrew, often cursing at and threatening Andrew. On several occasions, Daniel has also tried making Andrew pay for his meals. | Daniel's developmental disabilities and online manipulation cause him to think that he is extremely famous. Due to the nature of Daniel's care, Andrew was often blamed by Daniel for stealing money, destroying his career, as well as making his life difficult. In many of Daniel's TikToks, Daniel shows disregard and contempt for Andrew, often cursing at and threatening Andrew. On several occasions, Daniel has also tried making Andrew pay for his meals. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
There is reason to believe that Andrew is not actually responsible for Daniel's accusations. Daniel has claimed that he spoken over the phone with Andrew, who said that Daniel did not "need to go to court, regardless of what the warrants" said. This was clear evidence that Daniel purposely used Andrew as a scapegoat for any problem that occurred in his life. There is no possibility that Andrew, a state employee, had told Daniel not to appear in court. Instead, Daniel saw an opportunity to avoid going to court (as well as any further “failure to appear” fines) by a utilizing a baseless claim that his disability case manager said he was not required to attend. | There is reason to believe that Andrew is not actually responsible for Daniel's accusations. Daniel has claimed that he spoken over the phone with Andrew, who said that Daniel did not "need to go to court, regardless of what the warrants" said. This was clear evidence that Daniel purposely used Andrew as a scapegoat for any problem that occurred in his life. There is no possibility that Andrew, a state employee, had told Daniel not to appear in court. Instead, Daniel saw an opportunity to avoid going to court (as well as any further “failure to appear” fines) by a utilizing a baseless claim that his disability case manager said he was not required to attend. | ||
== | == References == | ||
<references/> | |||