1,684
edits
m (Protected "Politics" ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite))) |
(added geopolitics as a reason for not invading NK & Russia) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Since his early presence on the internet, Chance has been somewhat sparsely vocal about '''politics'''. Chance is ''vaguely'' libertarian, as his views are mostly just run-of-the-mill anti-government sentiment but with the additional lack of any sort of nuance or critical thinking due to his [[Intelligence|lack of ability to comprehend either]] and [[Delusions and Ego|refusal to believe he's wrong]]. | Since his early presence on the internet, Chance has been somewhat sparsely vocal about '''politics'''. Chance is ''vaguely'' libertarian, as his views are mostly just run-of-the-mill anti-government sentiment but with the additional lack of any sort of nuance or critical thinking due to his [[Intelligence|lack of ability to comprehend either]] and [[Delusions and Ego|refusal to believe he's wrong]]. | ||
A clear example of this is a video where he advocates for the the US to invade Russia and North Korea to depose Putin and Kim Jong Un, not being able to understand that we haven't because they have nukes.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR3GpAiPFxQ</ref> Another example of this is him ranting about zero tolerance gun laws, where he argues against zero tolerance laws by saying that they unjustly arrest people for defending themselves against attackers,<ref>https://odysee.com/@UnofficialCyraxArchive:b/2014-5-20-Zero-Tolerance-Law:0</ref> clearly confusing them with [[wikipedia:Duty_to_retreat|duty to retreat laws]] as zero tolerance laws regulate gun ownership, not self-defense. | A clear example of this is a video where he advocates for the the US to invade Russia and North Korea to depose Putin and Kim Jong Un, not being able to understand that we haven't because of many complicated geopolitical reasons, the main one being that they have nukes.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR3GpAiPFxQ</ref> Another example of this is him ranting about zero tolerance gun laws, where he argues against zero tolerance laws by saying that they unjustly arrest people for defending themselves against attackers,<ref>https://odysee.com/@UnofficialCyraxArchive:b/2014-5-20-Zero-Tolerance-Law:0</ref> clearly confusing them with [[wikipedia:Duty_to_retreat|duty to retreat laws]] as zero tolerance laws regulate gun ownership, not self-defense. | ||
== Sources == | == Sources == | ||