Shadokai Saga: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Nintendo
m (StupidStu moved page Shadowkai Saga to Shadokai Saga: Misspelled title) |
m (→Nintendo) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Nintendo == | == Nintendo == | ||
On September 17th 2025, Cyraxx released a video announcing that his Shadokai project had was being picked up by a multinational production company<ref>[https://rumble.com/v6z2w8i-cyraxx-09-17-25-brand-new-start.html? https://rumble.com/v6z2w8i-cyraxx-09-17-25-brand-new-start.html?]</ref>, which he | On September 17th 2025, Cyraxx released a video announcing that his Shadokai project had was being picked up by a multinational production company<ref>[https://rumble.com/v6z2w8i-cyraxx-09-17-25-brand-new-start.html? https://rumble.com/v6z2w8i-cyraxx-09-17-25-brand-new-start.html?]</ref>, which he refused to name to avoid troll interference, and immediately envisioned prospects of a franchise and even a toy line. He celebrated his "victory" over trolls and boasted about all the collection cars he would buy himself with his first paycheck. Many noted the eerie similarity with the infamous Bender Boyz record deal celebration video that kicked off Cyraxx's infamy eight years prior. | ||
The fall of this blatantly obvious trolling scheme came | The fall of this blatantly obvious trolling scheme came on the 24th of September, when Cyraxx recieved a troll-penned cease and desist letter from Nintendo of America, telling him that ShadoKai was an obvious Pokémon rip-off. In a desperate bid to turn the situation into his favor, Cyraxx boasted that the letter inadvertently provided him with enough evidence to lock up William and John John for good this time<ref>https://rumble.com/v6zeii8-cyraxx-09-24-25-letter-from-video-game-company.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a</ref>. Not only does he think that he can have the letter dusted for fingerprints (while manipulating it with his bare hands himself), but that impersonating a Nintendo employee is a severe federal felony punishable by imprisonment. | ||
Legally-speaking, impersonating the employee of a company only constitutes a crime if done with illicit intent, such as fraud, scamming or monetary gain (a point which Cyraxx even reads out). Doing so for a mere prank will most likely not stick for a hypothetical case. | Legally-speaking, impersonating the employee of a company only constitutes a crime if done with illicit intent, such as fraud, scamming or monetary gain (a point which Cyraxx even reads out). Doing so for a mere prank will most likely not stick for a hypothetical case. | ||
== References == | == References == | ||